Series / Volume
ISAC Museum Publications 4
ISAC has worked in Nubia for over one hundred years making it one of the few institutions in the world to have such a long and continued engagement with the region. Further, the ISAC Museum is one of the few places in the world outside of the countries of Egypt and Sudan, which has a dedicated permanent gallery to ancient Nubia. It also has a separate publication series, Nubian Expedition dedicated to publishing the materials found in the course of ISAC excavations.
The kingdom that today we called “Nubia” was located in the area that is now part of the Arab Republic of Egypt in the north and the Republic of Sudan in the south. We do not know what the name of the country where the ancient Nubians lived, but Nubian rulers who left monuments written in hieroglyphs refer to it as “Kush,” “Ta-Sety” (“Land of the Bow”) or “Ta-Nahesi” (“Land of the Nubians”), using the ancient Egyptian terms for the region. The Nubians themselves likely spoke languages in the Nilo-Saharan language family and modern Nubian languages exist today. The Greeks referred to the region as “Ethiopia” (also spelled “Aithiopia”) which has led to confusion between Nubia and the modern Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia which is located further south. This term continued to be used in scholarship until the early twentieth century. The word “Nubia” does not come from the ancient Egyptian word for “gold” and is rather a term used first in medieval Europe, presumably derived from the Greek “Nobatae,” which emerges in Late Antiquity.
Nubia’s history goes as far back to Early Pleistocene (2.58 million years ago–773,000 years ago) and was the location of some of Northeast Africa’s most powerful empires. Nubia played and active and important role in the history of the ancient world at times controlling a region that stretched some 1750 miles from at least the area of modern Khartoum in the south to the modern countries of Israel and Palestine in the north. What we know about its rulers tells us that Nubia had a system of government that is unique in the ancient world. The importance of the role of women in rulership is clear, even during periods when only men are attested as kings because it was the queens who made the rule of the king legitimate. Later, women ruled as kings or as kandakes (a Meroitic term that may refer to the important role of the king’s mother), occasionally with male co-rulers, but more frequently on their own. They led armies and defeated the Romans, thereby stopping the Roman army’s advance further into Africa.
View of the lion-temple of Apedemak from the northeast.
The Napatan kings (eighth–third centuries BCE) left inscriptions behind to tell us what was important to them. They speak of their mothers, their sisters, and their female ancestors but rarely is there any mention fathers or male forbears, presumably because it was not important. In contrast to other documented parts of the ancient world, the eldest son did not inherit from the previous king. Rather, it was the sister’s son (and not necessarily the eldest son) who inherited, and the sister (who was then the king’s mother) had to approve the choice of king. This might be the king’s son because Nubian kings did marry their sisters, but it is not clear. By the end of the Napatan period this inheritance system changed and women began ruling in their own right and calling themselves kings. In the Meroitic period, women continued to rule as kings, but they also used Meroitic terms to describe themselves (qore a gender-neutral term that means “ruler” and kandake, which likely refers to the king’s mother). The chronology of Meroitic rulers remains under discussion, but in some cases it appears the women rulers succeeded each other.
Nubia’s location on the Nile River and its connections to the Red Sea, meant that it controlled important trade routes that linked Western, Central, and Southern Africa to Egypt and the Eastern Mediterranean as well as having connections with Arabia and the Indian Ocean. It made and supplied luxury goods to its own people as well as further afield and it was an important source of natural materials such as gold, semi-precious stones, and ivory. They created monumental buildings and tombs, including temples, massive burial tumuli, stone circles, and pyramids and they created intricate rock art panels in cliffs along the Nile and inland. Nubia also imported goods and used those as inspiration in some of its art. This is particularly the case with Egypt, where the close relationship between the two regions meant that both countries profoundly impacted each other. Some Nubian art is clearly influenced by Egyptian art, but the Nubians took Egyptian motifs and produced a new art that is distinctly Nubian not Egyptian.
Nubia was a multilingual society with people speaking a variety of languages, a situation that is mirrored among modern Nubians today. Ancient Nubian languages were part of the Nilo-Saharan language family. We have limited evidence for written language in Nubia (or something we recognize as a written language) prior to the first millennium BCE. There is evidence that some Nubians could read and write Egyptian hieroglyphs, but it is not until the Napatan period when Nubian rulers began leaving long inscriptions written in hieroglyphs. They did not write down their own language until the Meroitic period, when they start writing the Meroitic language. They primarily use the Demotic Egyptian script to write Meroitic, although in some cases they use hieroglyphs for this purpose, while continuing to use hieroglyphs to write ancient Egyptian. Meroitic still remains incompletely understood. In the Late Antique period, they begin writing using alphabetic scripts. While Meroitic disappears, another Nilo-Saharan language, Old Nubian, begins to be used. It is written using the Coptic script (itself based on Greek) with several extra letters. In addition to Old Nubian, Greek and Coptic are used in the medieval period and increasingly, Arabic.
Archaeological evidence suggests that early people were in Nubia since at least the Late Pliocene/Early Pleistocene (2,58 million years ago –773,000 years ago) although better archaeological evidence exists for the Middle Pleistocene (774,100–129,000 years ago). There is evidence for groups foraging and ultimately settling along the Nile River and early hominins, such as Homo erectus/Homo ergaster and Homo heidelbergensis also transiting through Nubia to West Asia.
During the African Humid Period (so-called "Green Sahara") the climate in Nubia, as well as elsewhere in North Africa, was much wetter than it is today. This in in the Mesolithic period (ninth–fifth millennium BCE). It meant it was possible to live in what today is the Sahara desert. Pottery starts being used in the mid-ninth millennium BCE in Nubia, but groups are still hunter-gatherers and their animals and plants are not domesticated. There are many sites in Nubia in this period and distinctive decorated ceramics. There is also a large amount of fish consumption in this period.
In the Neolithic period (sixth–fourth millennium BCE), there continues to be considerable settlement in the Nile Valley in Nubia. Domesticated plants and animals appear and one starts to find cattle bucrania in graves. The economy was probably not exclusively pastoral however, as there are signs of the cultivation of foodstuffs as well. There is unfortunately very limited evidence for habitation from this period. Most of the evidence we have comes from graves.
The A-Group (ca. 3800–2900 BCE), was an indigenous complex society in Lower Nubia which had elaborate cemeteries and grave goods, as well as sophisticated herding practices. A key piece is the Qustul Incense burner, an undoubtedly Nubian object whose motifs show a close correspondence with contemporary objects from Predynastic Egypt pointing to the shared motifs between Nubia and region to the north. At the same time further south in Nubia, the Pre-Kerma culture (ca. 3500–2500 BCE) in the south provides evidence for monumental architecture such as fortifications.
It is at Kerma where Nubia manifested itself into the one of the great empires of the second millennium BCE: the empire of Kerma, named for its presumed capital with its massive burial tumuli. Lower Nubia was occupied at this time by pastoralist groups known as the C-Group (2500–1500 BCE), which was dominated at times by Middle Kingdom Egypt (ca. 1938–1725 BCE), who built a series of fortresses along the Nile to reinforce their control of the region. The kingdom at Kerma expanded northwards and absorbed Lower Nubia, uniting the two regions together into a powerful kingdom that challenged Egypt for dominance of Northeast Africa.
Kerma was ultimately defeated by a resurgent New Kingdom Egypt and Nubia began to be absorbed into the Egyptian empire (ca. 1500–1070 BCE). The levels of assimilation and control varied, but Egypt’s goal was to make Nubia part of Egypt. As such, they built temple-towns where Egyptian gods were worshipped and Egyptians immigrated and settled in Nubia, while the Nubians negotiated a new reality being under Egypt. At the end of the Twentieth Dynasty, however, Nubian rule ceased in Egypt.
In 750 BCE, rulers based at Napata (Jebel Barkal) began to consolidate their control first over Nubia, but then in Egypt itself. The ruler Kashta took over Upper Egypt, followed by his son Piankhi who controlled all of Egypt in what became known as the Twenty-Fifth Dynasty. The Napatans controlled both Egypt and Nubia for about 100 years and also expanded into the Levant, where they came into conflict with the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Ultimately, they had to retreat from Egypt itself and by the middle of the seventh century BCE controlled Nubia only, but they continued to use the title “King of Upper and Lower Egypt” for centuries afterwards. The Napatan kingdom continued to expand its control and influence to regions southwards, ultimately leading to the move of the capital from Jebel Barkal to Meroe.
In the third century BCE, the capital of the Napatan Empire moves southwards to Meroe, marking the beginning of the Meroitic period. Meroe ruled a vast expanse down to the Sahelian regions, some 850 miles southwards. The rulers of Meroe clashed with the Romans, remaining independent despite Rome’s best efforts to subjugate them. This is also the first period when the Nubians are writing in their own language, although they used Egyptian scripts. We do not understand a lot about the period because while they left lengthy inscriptions, we still cannot fully decipher them.
The Meroitic period ended in the middle of the fourth century CE, when Ezana, King of the Aksumite Empire (located in modern Etihopia and Eritrea) invaded and occupied Meroe. Once the Meroitic kingdom ended, the region was divided into three regions: Nobadia (Northern Nubia), Makuria (Central Nubia), and Alodia (Southern Nubia). While there may have been political fragmentation, there continued to be powerful rulers who were based in these regions, as seen by the rich tombs filled with luxury goods (both locally produced and imported) that can be found at some sites. The other major change in this period was the beginnings of Christianity in Nubia.
The Christian period starts in the seventh century when Makuria and Nobadia combined together to form a single kingdom. In the North, the Muslim armies had conquered Egypt, meaning that the Christian kingdoms of Nubia together with the Aksumite Empire to the south, were the only Christian kingdoms remaining in Africa. By the eleventh century, Alodia/Alwa and Makuria had unified into a single kingdom once again, known as the kingdom of Dotawo. Conflict with Egypt in the thirteenth–fourteenth centuries leads to considerable chaos in the kingdom and by the sixteenth century the Ottomans conquer the north while in Southern Egypt the Kingdom of Funj rules and Christianity disappears.
Even prior to the founding of the Oriental Institute (now ISAC), University of Chicago scholars were interested in Nubia. James Henry Breasted, who was professor of Egyptology and head of the Haskell Oriental Museum, did two documentation campaigns in Nubia in 1905–1906 and 1906–1907. Building on his work Ancient Records of Egypt, the purpose of this expedition was to document the written monuments of Nubia. Once the Oriental Institute was founded, Breasted did not neglect Nubia, this time focusing on the prehistoric periods. William Joscelyn Arkell (1904–1958) and Kenneth Stuart Sandford (1899–1971) worked between 1926–1933 to document prehistoric sites throughout Egypt and northern Sudan.
After a long hiatus, the Oriental Institute once again was involved in Nubia, documenting monuments under destruction, this time because of the building of the Aswan High Dam. In 1960–1964, ISAC was part of the UNESCO international salvage excavation project to document areas that were in danger of being flooded. This included cemeteries from different periods, settlements, and a medieval monastery. The materials found in the excavations are now being documented in the ISAC publication series Nubian Expedition.